Insights

A tale of two valuations does not necessarily imply US equities are expensive

  • Written By: Daniel Casali
  • Published: Fri, 22 May 2020 11:08 GMT

Since the US equity market bottomed out, its subsequent rebound has caught many investors off-guard. Investors are taking a closer look at valuations. From a cursory glance, US equity price-to-earnings (PE) ratios may seem expensive based on downward revised company earnings (Earnings Per Share, or EPS) for 2020. However, perhaps a more nuanced approach is required to analyse company valuations, PE ratios based on upward revised 2021-2022 EPS expectations do not look as demanding (chart 1). Given the assumption that US output restarts and earnings can return, US equities could look more reasonably priced.

Moreover, equities should also probably be valued against record amounts of funding that the authorities have injected into the financial system to shore up struggling businesses and households from lockdowns during the COVID-19 outbreak. For example, if market capitalisation is compared against M3 broad money supply (a measure of money flowing around the financial system including saving deposits and currency in circulation), then equities do not look that demanding relative to history.

Chart 1: Divergence in company 2021-22 and 2020 earnings expectations

Source: Refinitiv Datastream/Smith & Williamson Investment Management LLP, as at 20 May 2020

A tale of toppy PE valuations for 2020

The US S&P 500 PE ratio is currently trading on 22.6x 2020 EPS expectations, the highest level for 18 years, thanks to both the equity rally and falling EPS expectations1. COVID-19 has and will continue to have, different degrees of impact on different sectors> However, company earnings for 2020 are generally forecast to be down across the board. Meanwhile, equity markets have rebounded impressively since their trough on 23rd March, giving the deceptive impression of a return to normality. The result of these factors is an elevated 2020 PE ratio, which is further from its 3-year moving average (in terms of standard deviations) than it has been at any point in the last 30 years (chart 2)2. Considering this alone, investors are paying high prices for low earnings.

Chart 2: US equities valued on 2020 company earnings appear more demanding

Source: Refinitiv Datastream/Smith & Williamson Investment Management LLP, as at 20 May 2020

Another tale for PE valuations

Despite poor 2020 earnings, economic forecasts are leading analysts to revise company EPS up for 2021-2022. When PE multiples are based on 2021-2022 earnings, valuations appear a lot less demanding. The PE ratios for 2021 and 2022 are 17.5x and 15.0x, respectively, both of which are broadly in line with their 3-year rolling averages and are lower than pre-COVID-19 levels (chart 3)3.

Chart 3: US PE ratios based on 2021 and 2022 EPS expectations are below pre-COVID-19 levels

In short, if COVID-19 is viewed as an aberrant event impacting 2020 company earnings only, then the choice of valuation metrics should be adjusted accordingly. For those who believe that the current global situation of lockdowns and low earnings will remain, then 2020 PE ratios makes sense as it provides an accurate picture of the current situation. For others, further forward-looking metrics like 2021 and 2022 Pes provide a more accurate picture.

Our house view remains tilted towards an economic recovery that increases the probability of 2021 and 2022 EPS expectations being broadly met. Crucial to this is the fact that government furlough schemes are providing consumers with an income and confidence that they will return to a job. Some sectors will inevitably suffer long term structural damage, but it seems that COVID-19 is manifesting as a short-sharp natural disaster type of crisis, rather than a drawn-out recovery like the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008.

One way to observe this phenomenon is through the US labour market. We suspect that the significant increase in US initial jobless claims over the past few months closely resembles a natural disaster, rather than a cyclical economic downturn. For instance, when Hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana in August 2005, state jobless claims jumped by 25 times up to September of that year, and immediately declined afterwards (chart 4)4. A similar pattern can be seen today; US national jobless claims rose by 32 times in March due to COVID-19 lockdowns5. Jobless claims are now trending down as they did in Louisiana back in September 2005. In contrast, it took a long time for joblessness to come back to normal levels after the GFC.

Chart 4: COVID-19 recession looks like a natural disaster than a cyclical downturn

Source: Refinitiv Datastream/Smith & Williamson Investment Management LLP, as at 20 May 2020
Given this view, assessing equities on a 2-3y forward PE basis is probably prudent and importantly, provides evidence to suggest that equity valuations are not necessarily expensive. Of course, a lack of clarity still mists forecasts. With no vaccine in circulation and the possibility of secondary outbreaks, it is possible that normality will not return soon. Ultimately the market price of a company is a forward-looking indication of the company’s future earnings. Thus, assessing equity valuations needs to be done in conjunction with macroeconomic views of when earnings will return.

A liquidity twist in the tale

As shown earlier, trying to assess value through PEs at this juncture could be misleading. Analysts may be slow to upgrade or downgrade numbers because of their behavioural bias, anchoring on what they have said previously. Forward guidance from individual firms, which forms part of analysts’ views, has been lacking. With so much uncertainty over company earnings, it may be more appropriate to consider valuations that incorporate the increase in money supply from policy stimulus. As we discussed in our Risk of high inflation beyond the near-term, 1 May Webinar, this liquidity ends up in broad M3 money supply. The latest data shows M3 money supply is growing at nearly 25% from a year ago, the fastest pace from data going back to 19826. It would be reasonable to expect some of this cash generating minimal returns in low interest deposits and money market funds to eventually trickle its way into the stock market. Currently, US stock market capitalisation is valued at 122% of broad money supply, its lowest level since 2012 outside of this year’s sell-off and is below the long-term average of 156%7. Arguably, not all this money will go into the stock market, but investors at some point may decide to take on more risk in equities. Furthermore, given the scale of the money flowing into the financial system, institutional investors may be underweight equities, encouraging them to top up equity positions in the future.

Chart 5: The value of equities does not look high relative to money in the financial system

Source: Refinitiv Datastream/Smith & Williamson Investment Management LLP, as at 20 May 2020

In conclusion, PE valuation metrics are giving mixed messages. If one is of the view that the collapse in earnings will be permanent, then use of an elevated 2020 PE ratio makes sense. But if you believe society will return to some semblance of normality then one must look beyond the crisis and consider less demanding valuations based on 2021-22 EPS.

The added twist is that given the unprecedented monetary/fiscal stimulus, valuations should also probably be compared with the record amounts of liquidity injected into the monetary system. On that basis, equities do not look that expensive.

Provided output recovers as the US government opens the economy after COVID-19, there is potential room for valuations to expand from here over the next 12 months. A big unknown is whether we get another COVID-19 outbreak as lockdowns are lifted. The key question is will governments impose similar travel restrictions knowing the economic impact and potential social backlash, as populations grow weary of being locked down.

Please note specified government legislation is that prevailing at the time, is subject to change without notice and depends on individual circumstances

Sources:
1 Refinitiv Datastream/ Smith & Williamson Investment management LLP/ 20/05/2020
2 Refinitiv Datastream/ Smith & Williamson Investment management LLP/ 20/05/2020
3 Refinitiv Datastream/ Smith & Williamson Investment management LLP/ 20/05/2020
4 Refinitiv Datastream/ Smith & Williamson Investment management LLP/ 20/05/2020
5 Refinitiv Datastream/ Smith & Williamson Investment management LLP/ 20/05/2020
6 Refinitiv Datastream/ Smith & Williamson Investment management LLP/ 20/05/2020
7 Refinitiv Datastream/ Smith & Williamson Investment management LLP/ 20/05/2020

Return to the COVID-19 hub homepage

DISCLAIMER
By necessity, this briefing can only provide a short overview and it is essential to seek professional advice before applying the contents of this article. No responsibility can be taken for any loss arising from action taken or refrained from on the basis of this publication. Details correct at time of publication.

Please remember investment involves risk. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and investors may not receive back the original amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

Notes to editors
Smith & Williamson is an independently owned professional and financial services group with over 1,800 people. The group is a leading provider of investment management, financial advisory and accountancy services to private clients, professional practices and mid-to-large corporates. The group has twelve offices; these are in London, Belfast, Birmingham, Bristol, Cheltenham, Dublin (City and Sandyford), Glasgow, Guildford, Jersey, Salisbury and Southampton.

Smith & Williamson Investment Management LLP is part of the Smith & Williamson group.
Smith & Williamson Investment Management LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Ref: 72320eb

Cookie Settings