Asset performance when the Fed loosens
Markets have recovered from the May equity sell-off following uncertainty caused by the US-China trade tariff spat. Fairly resilient company earnings, a point we highlighted in our May Investment Outlook, rising expectations that the US and China will resolve their trade dispute and an increased probability that the Federal Reserve loosens monetary policy has helped to lift stock markets. The Fed Futures market has priced- in three US interest rate cuts over the next year, up from one cut at the start of May, with the first loosening expected at the July Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).
To determine whether Fed policy loosening is positive or negative for equities, we looked at data going back to the mid-1980s. We found that there were six distinctive Fed loosening cycles that could be classified as a “pause” or a “panic”. The four Fed pauses, where the central bank cut interest rates modestly (October 1987, July 1995 and September 1998) or guided on being patient in raising rates (February 2016) were in response to a slight softening in the macro data. Our analysis shows that US equities rallied on average 23% over the course of a year from the start of a Fed pause.
The two Fed panics, which led to the FOMC cutting interest rates aggressively, occurred from January 2001 (following the dotcom overvaluation stock market bubble) and from September 2007 (during the global financial crisis, when the global financial system was leveraged to the US housing market). Crucially, when the Fed began to loosen during a panic, the central bank was viewed by the market to be reactive to unfolding events, rather than proactive, and this led to a loss of investor confidence that led to a recession. From our calculations, we found that US equities fell on average by 16% over the course of a year at the start of a Fed panic.
Though there have been some weak US data points of late (e.g. non-farm payrolls and the manufacturing ISM survey), the underlying economy continues to be underpinned by healthy take-home pay and fairly buoyant corporate profit growth. It is our assessment that the Fed is set to cut rates in response to slightly weaker macro data (largely self-inflicted by President Trump’s trade protectionism agenda), rather than in reaction to an anticipated deeper economic downturn. As such, we still remain constructive on US (and global) stocks, but risks have risen lately.
Rising chance of a no deal Brexit
Over the past few months there has been a series of political events that together raise the chance of the UK leaving the EU without a deal. First, is the success of the Brexit party, and the rejuvenation in the Liberal Democrats (Lib Dems), which has lured disgruntled leave and remain voters away from the Conservatives (Tories) and Labour. By failing to deliver on Brexit, the Tories managed to win just 9% of the vote in the May European parliamentary election, its lowest share for a national election since the party was formed in 1834, while the Brexit party came first with a 31% share of the vote. Labour did win the Peterborough by-election with 31% of the vote, ahead of 29% for the Brexit party, but it came after a sizeable 17% swing against its last election result. Both the major parties fear that they will continue to lose voters, whether they are leavers or remainers, unless they resolve Brexit one way or another.
Assuming Tory party members elect Boris Johnson, an ardent leaver, in July as the next leader and Prime Minister, there is a risk that the government will take a more determined approach to the UK exiting the EU with or without a deal. Boris Johnson’s threat that the UK will withhold the £39bn divorce payment may make the EU less willing to agree a Brexit extension. Moreover, there is a tight timetable for the UK and EU to reach an agreement, as the next EU Council meeting is on 17-18 October, which gives very little time to negotiate before the 31 October deadline for Brexit. And logistically, the new European Commission will not be sworn in until 1 November, making negotiations problematic to organise.
Irrespective of whether or not a no deal Brexit materialises in the autumn, political uncertainty is weighing down on the UK economy. In April, real GDP grew 1.3% from a year ago, its lowest rate this year. Economic growth was led lower by the biggest decline in manufacturing production for almost 17 years, as auto producers’ scaled back production after an earlier boom in stockpiled goods before the original Brexit deadline at the end of March that has since been extended into the autumn. Nevertheless, the economy has not slipped into recession, since the service sector continues to grow and is supported by a strong labour market and rising wages. Even so, given the risk of a no deal Brexit, downside risks to sterling-related assets make the UK a less attractive investment destination on a risk-to-reward basis than opportunities overseas.
By necessity, this briefing can only provide a short overview and it is essential to seek professional advice before applying the contents of this article. No responsibility can be taken for any loss arising from action taken or refrained from on the basis of this publication. Details correct at time of publication.
Investment does involve risk. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up. The investor may not receive back, in total, the original amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Rates of tax are those prevailing at the time and are subject to change without notice. Clients should always seek appropriate advice from their financial adviser before committing funds for investment. When investments are made in overseas securities, movements in exchange rates may have an effect on the value of that investment. The effect may be favourable or unfavourable.